On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Thomas Gries <mail(a)tgries.de> wrote:
Am 22.03.2013 07:29, schrieb K. Peachey:
What actual benefit with having their
abbreviation in the title archive?
Make users aware at the first glance to the TOC,
that XSS is this and
CSRF is that if they did not yet know this.
You, as expert, can overread the part in parentheses.
I am the "editor" of that book, and I like it in.
BTW, what is the purpose in having a title "DOM-based XSS" (like it is now)
instead of the more distinct and absolutely clear title
"DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (CSS)"
"Cross-Site Scripting (DOM-based)" might be a better name for that
page? I didn't put much thought into it before naming it originally.
It would be good to make the names consistent, thanks for working on
this Thomas.