MediaWiki Bugzilla Report for July 20, 2009 - July 27, 2009
Status changes this week
Bugs NEW : 165 Bugs ASSIGNED : 9 Bugs REOPENED : 27 Bugs RESOLVED : 174
Total bugs still open: 3848
Resolutions for the week:
Bugs marked FIXED : 103 Bugs marked REMIND : 0 Bugs marked INVALID : 19 Bugs marked DUPLICATE : 24 Bugs marked WONTFIX : 15 Bugs marked WORKSFORME : 14 Bugs marked LATER : 2 Bugs marked MOVED : 0
Specific Product/Component Resolutions & User Metrics
New Bugs Per Component
Site requests 8 server 7 General/Unknown 5 Maps 4 API 4
New Bugs Per Product
MediaWiki 33 Wikimedia 15 MediaWiki extensions 22 mwdumper 1 Wikipedia Mobile 8
Top 5 Bug Resolvers
innocentkiller [AT] gmail.com 24 alex.emsenhuber [AT] bluewin.ch 17 brion [AT] wikimedia.org 16 happy-melon [AT] live.com 15 tstarling [AT] wikimedia.org 11
reporter@isidore.wikimedia.org wrote:
MediaWiki Bugzilla Report for July 20, 2009 - July 27, 2009
Bugs NEW : 165 Bugs RESOLVED : 174
I think this is the first time for quite a while that more bugs have been resolved than created. Congratulations to everyone responsible! :)
2009/7/27 Nikola Smolenski smolensk@eunet.yu:
reporter@isidore.wikimedia.org wrote:
MediaWiki Bugzilla Report for July 20, 2009 - July 27, 2009
Bugs NEW : 165 Bugs RESOLVED : 174
I think this is the first time for quite a while that more bugs have been resolved than created. Congratulations to everyone responsible! :)
Could it be due to the new "known to fail" logic?
Andrew Dunbar (hippietrail)
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Andrew Dunbarhippytrail@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/27 Nikola Smolenski smolensk@eunet.yu:
reporter@isidore.wikimedia.org wrote:
MediaWiki Bugzilla Report for July 20, 2009 - July 27, 2009
Bugs NEW : 165 Bugs RESOLVED : 174
I think this is the first time for quite a while that more bugs have been resolved than created. Congratulations to everyone responsible! :)
Could it be due to the new "known to fail" logic?
Andrew Dunbar (hippietrail)
Someone (I forget who) when though and marked all the old bugs that are possibly fixed or fixed as either FIXED or REMIND. that is what most likely caused it.
That was me, which explains how I got on the 'leaderboard' for the first time ever... :-D
Someone then came round and changed all the REMINDs to 'something-other-than-remind', saying effectively that we don't use REMIND; bugs should either be left open or resolved INVALID/WORKSFORME/WONTFIX. Is this right? I can see the logic of that in one sense, but in another it makes sense to me to have a way of marking bugs as "this isn't fixed and is valid, but has been stale for years, no one gives a damn and it's unlikely to ever get any movement". Thoughts? Is the REMIND resolution useful?
--HM
"K. Peachey" p858snake@yahoo.com.au wrote in message news:4c103ee70907270130i76f16368u808fcdfe08384c55@mail.gmail.com...
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Andrew Dunbarhippytrail@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/27 Nikola Smolenski smolensk@eunet.yu:
reporter@isidore.wikimedia.org wrote:
MediaWiki Bugzilla Report for July 20, 2009 - July 27, 2009
Bugs NEW : 165 Bugs RESOLVED : 174
I think this is the first time for quite a while that more bugs have been resolved than created. Congratulations to everyone responsible! :)
Could it be due to the new "known to fail" logic?
Andrew Dunbar (hippietrail)
Someone (I forget who) when though and marked all the old bugs that are possibly fixed or fixed as either FIXED or REMIND. that is what most likely caused it.
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Happy-melonhappy-melon@live.com wrote:
That was me, which explains how I got on the 'leaderboard' for the first time ever... :-D
Someone then came round and changed all the REMINDs to 'something-other-than-remind', saying effectively that we don't use REMIND; bugs should either be left open or resolved INVALID/WORKSFORME/WONTFIX. Is this right? I can see the logic of that in one sense, but in another it makes sense to me to have a way of marking bugs as "this isn't fixed and is valid, but has been stale for years, no one gives a damn and it's unlikely to ever get any movement". Thoughts? Is the REMIND resolution useful?
--HM
"K. Peachey" p858snake@yahoo.com.au wrote in message news:4c103ee70907270130i76f16368u808fcdfe08384c55@mail.gmail.com...
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Andrew Dunbarhippytrail@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/27 Nikola Smolenski smolensk@eunet.yu:
reporter@isidore.wikimedia.org wrote:
MediaWiki Bugzilla Report for July 20, 2009 - July 27, 2009
Bugs NEW : 165 Bugs RESOLVED : 174
I think this is the first time for quite a while that more bugs have been resolved than created. Congratulations to everyone responsible! :)
Could it be due to the new "known to fail" logic?
Andrew Dunbar (hippietrail)
Someone (I forget who) when though and marked all the old bugs that are possibly fixed or fixed as either FIXED or REMIND. that is what most likely caused it.
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Seeing as we don't use REMIND like ever, it's not terribly useful. That, and we don't close bugs just because they're stale (or so I've been reminded any time I've done it).
-Chad
On 27/07/2009, at 10:31 AM, Happy-melon wrote:
That was me, which explains how I got on the 'leaderboard' for the first time ever... :-D
Someone then came round and changed all the REMINDs to 'something-other-than-remind', saying effectively that we don't use REMIND; bugs should either be left open or resolved INVALID/WORKSFORME/ WONTFIX. Is this right? I can see the logic of that in one sense, but in another it makes sense to me to have a way of marking bugs as "this isn't fixed and is valid, but has been stale for years, no one gives a damn and it's unlikely to ever get any movement". Thoughts? Is the REMIND resolution useful?
I think it's better to dial the priority down on them.
-- Andrew Garrett agarrett@wikimedia.org http://werdn.us/
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org