Kaixo!
I found two bugs with [[Image:...]] syntax:
* when using "thumb", if no caption is given, extra empty space is displayed at the right of the image ( compare [[Image:foo.png|thumb|]] and [[Image:foo.png|thumb|aaa]] ) * when using "framed" it isn't possible to resize the image (eg: [[Image:foo.png|framed|150px|left]] doesn't work; is it on purpose?)
Thanks
Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
- when using "thumb", if no caption is given, extra empty space is displayed at the right of the image ( compare [[Image:foo.png|thumb|]] and [[Image:foo.png|thumb|aaa]] )
OK, that's a bug, but shouldn't images always have a caption?
- when using "framed" it isn't possible to resize the image (eg: [[Image:foo.png|framed|150px|left]] doesn't work; is it on purpose?)
Interesting. I didn't know about "framed". What does that do? Is it the same as "thumb|none"? If so, why not use that? :)
Timwi
Kaixo! Li Fri, 11 Jun 2004 05:13:39 +0100, Timwi timwi@gmx.net scrijheut:
( compare [[Image:foo.png|thumb|]] and [[Image:foo.png|thumb|aaa]] )
T> OK, that's a bug, but shouldn't images always have a caption?
Well, in some cases a caption is useless and uglifies the page layout; for example a page about a given city, with a small image of the city coat of arms; does it adds anything to put a lable on a gray frame to tell "coat of armas of xxxx"?
- when using "framed" it isn't possible to resize the image (eg: [[Image:foo.png|framed|150px|left]] doesn't work; is it on purpose?)
T> Interesting. I didn't know about "framed". What does that do? Is it the T> same as "thumb|none"? If so, why not use that? :)
framed doesn't have the small "maximize/minimaze" looking image, for a frame without caption it is nicer to avoit that small icon, as it makes extra frame width on the bottom that is not filled with any text.
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org