On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Lee Worden <worden.lee(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I just noticed that the editsection links, now with
both the visual and
source editor links, use a pipe character (|) to separate the two. Is this
generally the desired way to separate multiple links in a bracketed section
like this, in MW? Is there a policy?
I ask because I've been producing editsection-like links for a long time
in our extension project, with commas in between - for example a LaTeX
document will come with a list of links like "[log, pdf, dvi]". Maybe I
should switch to using pipes instead of commas.
Jay's previous answer is correct I think. When choosing between pipes and
commas, the former are better for clear separation between equal elements.
However, the honest truth is that using punctuation to call out and
separate interactive elements like this is a pretty retrograde UI pattern.
Images or symbols plus words are together more easily memorable than words
alone. If you are in a situation where you let users interact with a LaTeX
document using a variety of methods, the ideal design might be one where
you give each type (log, pdf, dvi) a small, simple, and easily
distinguishable icon. Adding things like appropriate styles on hover, to
denote when a user is about to select an element, also might be helpful.
Ultimately I think we want to be shooting for a world where we can just use
whitespace, icons, and other less busy-looking methods to denote section
edit links,[1] rather than using punctuation.
Steven
1.
https://usability.wikimedia.org/wiki/Acai_Designs#Section_Edit_Links