On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Mono <monomium(a)gmail.com> wrote: +1. Much easier to read. :) Steven _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Am 11.04.2012 00:46, schrieb Rob Lanphier: Congrats :-) A few questions: 1. What ID was the branch point? Is this still the correct term?

2. How can I track which IDs will be deployed after this initial deployment? Currently I follow https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#q,mediawiki/+status:merged+branch:master,n,z to read all merged commits. Is there a 1.20 branch?

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Raimond Spekking <raimond.spekking(a)gmail.com> wrote: More or less. You can say "what commit was it branched at" too. In either case, the answer for core is 11f768c[0]. You can see the first couple of commits to wmf/1.20wmf1 starting with "Creating new WMF 1.20wmf1 branch." If you open any of the submodules in that commit, you'll be able to see the commit hash they were pinned at in the submodules. We branched from master, so everything's that's been merged in core or WMF-deployed extensions should be included. The commit sha1s (different for each extension) show up on Special:Version[1] and they link to GitWeb for each of those extensions. The cool thing about branching in git is you no longer see history on the deployment branch that starts *at the branch point.* You see the whole history of the file (as it appeared on master), so it's easy to track down where the file is in relation to master. -Chad [0] https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/gitweb?p=mediawiki/core.git;a=shortlog;h=ref… [1] https://test2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Version