Rowan Collins wrote: Hoi When we publish our content, we specify a license that should be valid for the use of our content. We have chosen GFDL and this implicitly means that the provisions of the GFDL aply to the use of our content by mirors as well. When we have content that is not compatible with the GFDL, we should delete this content. It is not reasonable to expect of a mirror to scrutinize every picture in order to find out if its license is compatible with what we say our license is. In this I think that Commons is doing well by ensuring that its conten is generally usable within what we aim to do given our license. I am of the opinion that all material that is indicated to be problematic because it cannot be used on a comercial mirror should be removed. Thanks, GerardM

Rowan Collins wrote: This is the sort of information that should be part of a "best practices" Wikipedia: namespace topic.