On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Jon Robson <jdlrobson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry I dropped the ball on this.
I've created the following 2 actionable tasks:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T139300
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T139301
I hope we can reach a decision somewhat promptly with this.
Jon, I like both of these.
First one: deciding what to do with CREDITS as a format process.
On some of my smaller projects I've started adding more patch contributors
into a main CREDITS file, which I think is a lot better than trying to
distinguish who's More Creditable. I lean towards putting in everyone who
submits a patch, in alpha order.
(I will say when I was asked to add my name to the AUTHORS file on the
'emscripten' cross-compiler for what I felt was a small patch, it made me
feel very appreciated -- and made me want to contribute more!)
I think we should either adopt that, or at least adopt _some_ consistent
process, and update the file to match based on what we can see.
Second one: removing the @author attributions on individual files. While it
can be nice to go back and say "hey it says I wrote this code!" it's also
very misleading to people who see attributions from 10 years ago and then
ask those people for help, and we have to say "sorry it's been completely
refactored since, but I'll try!" :) Major refactors may, or may not, update
the @authors bits.
I suspect either we should remove them, or have a rule that we're much more
amenable about including patchers and refactorers in them.
These should probably both go through our ArchCom RfC process, which we're
trying to get more involvement in both from WMFers and others.
-- brion
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Scott MacLeod <helianth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Rob and Wikimedians,
To further credit the work of Wikimedia community members, could we
explore
using the Douglas Adams' SQID example (which
Markus shared with the
Wikidata list recently ... [Wikidata] SQID evolved again: references
http://tools.wmflabs.org/sqid/#/view?id=Q42 ) ... and build upon this
incorporating the Wikipedia user pages (and your above examples) a
Wikipedia crediting process anticipating/planning for all 11 billion
people
(an estimate from Swedish statistician Hans
Rosling and many others) in
all
8,000 languages. (CC World University and school
is planning in parallel
to
be in all 8,000 languages and plan for all people
on earth by 2100, as
well
as seek to build in Bitcoin and Blockchain in
conjunction with developing
best STEM CC OpenCourseWare centric law schools in all countries' main
languages, even as WUaS develops CC university degrees accrediting on CC
MIT OCW in 7 languages and CC Yale OYC).
This would potentially lead to further planning for integrating
Wikidata/Wikibase via SQID with Wikitech/Wikimedia/Wikipedia community
members' contributions and in many languages.
Cheers, Scott
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Rob Lanphier <robla(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Andre Klapper <aklapper(a)wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
> > Is there a Phabricator task [associated with MediaWiki CREDITS file
> membership] so this topic does not get forgotten?
>
> Not that I'm aware of. It's easy to get lost looking through the
> various attempts to objectively characterize contributions (he says,
> just emerging from the fog of doing so himself). Here's a few places
> a person could go:
> * <https://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/scm.html>
> * <https://www.openhub.net/p/mediawiki/contributors>
> * <https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/graphs/contributors>
> * <http://koti.kapsi.fi/~federico/crstats/core.txt>
>
> ...and that's hardly comprehensive. The "productivity of mediawiki
> developers" thread from April[1] probably has some other sources I've
> missed. If I were to spend more time on this, I would start looking
> for the Phab tickets associated with the stats on Korma.
>
> I concur with Jon that we should endeavor to move to a more objective
> (and ideally, more automated) mechanism for acknowledgement, so that
> we don't have to rely on contributors confidently declaring that they
> deserve acknowledgement.
>
> Rob
> [1]
>
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.technical/86127
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
--
- Scott MacLeod - Founder & President
- 415 480 4577
-
http://scottmacleod.com
- Please donate to tax-exempt 501 (c) (3)
- World University and School
- via PayPal, or credit card, here -
-
http://worlduniversityandschool.org
- or send checks to
- PO Box 442, (86 Ridgecrest Road), Canyon, CA 94516
- World University and School - like Wikipedia with best STEM-centric
OpenCourseWare - incorporated as a nonprofit university and school in
California, and is a U.S. 501 (c) (3) tax-exempt educational
organization.
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
--
Jon Robson
*
http://jonrobson.me.uk
*
https://www.facebook.com/jonrobson
* @rakugojon
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l