I haven't read the paper itself, but just in case someone has a moment and is interested: http://www.technologyreview.com/view/520946/can-automated-editorial-tools-he...
That's probably more a topic for Wiki-research-l than for Wikitech-l (in particular since they seem to have published formulas rather than code). BTW, we briefly reviewed this preprint in the Wikimedia Research Newsletter back when the first version came out: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter/2012/June#Central_users_...
Also, there is quite a few other research out there about automatically assessing article quality - last year, there was even a small competition for such algorithms: http://www.webis.de/research/events/pan-12
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Juliusz Gonera jgonera@wikimedia.org wrote:
I haven't read the paper itself, but just in case someone has a moment and is interested: http://www.technologyreview.com/view/520946/can-automated-editorial-tools-he...
-- Juliusz
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org