Brion:
I applied someone else's patch by their request. If you've got an improved version, please send it over.
You did also choose to ignore my request (who I am to complain about that, after all you're the only Brion around here) and not deem it necessary to communicate about it (which is my main concern).
I happen to still feel responsable for EasyTimeline even when I did not deliver on earlier promises for explained reasons.
As I can't work on it in the near future, I will soon post the patch and explanation, so that someone else with perl knowledge or at least server access can do final tests.
Erik Zachte
epzachte@chello.nl wrote:
Brion:
I applied someone else's patch by their request. If you've got an improved version, please send it over.
You did also choose to ignore my request (who I am to complain about that, after all you're the only Brion around here) and not deem it necessary to communicate about it (which is my main concern).
I do apologize if you feel slighted by my failure to respond to that particular message; that was not my intention.
The problem with mixed plaintext & links is known and already in the bug tracker. Since you say you've already had an update "ready for months" that doesn't have this problem, it'd be great if we could see that; I'm not sure what other response would be useful.
I happen to still feel responsable for EasyTimeline even when I did not deliver on earlier promises for explained reasons.
As I can't work on it in the near future, I will soon post the patch and explanation, so that someone else with perl knowledge or at least server access can do final tests.
Great! Looking forward to it.
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org