http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics
The job queue length on the English Wikipedia is high and has been rising continuously. I suspect that something is stuck.
The resulting inconsistencies are confusing my bot a bit; I'll just work around the problem in the meantime.
Thanks!
Beland
Christopher Beland wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics
The job queue length on the English Wikipedia is high and has been rising continuously. I suspect that something is stuck.
The job queue is a _queue_.
You may indeed see it high for a couple hours before the job runners get back around to that wiki.
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Moin,
On Saturday 22 July 2006 07:33, Brion Vibber wrote:
Christopher Beland wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics
The job queue length on the English Wikipedia is high and has been rising continuously. I suspect that something is stuck.
The job queue is a _queue_.
You may indeed see it high for a couple hours before the job runners get back around to that wiki.
:) What is the "expected" or "normal" lenght? Currently I see:
The job queue length is currently 256,266.
That sounds a lot of jobs to do.
Best wishes,
Tels
- -- Signed on Sat Jul 22 13:21:00 2006 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email.
This email violates U.S. patent #5,546,528 and EU patent EP0689133:
________________________________________ | Header | Body | Attachements | | |--------+ +----------------------| | | ~ ~
Brion Vibber wrote:
Christopher Beland wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics
The job queue length on the English Wikipedia is high and has been rising continuously. I suspect that something is stuck.
The job queue is a _queue_.
You may indeed see it high for a couple hours before the job runners get back around to that wiki.
How do you ensure, though, that the rate of emptying the queue is overall less than the rate of filling it? In other words, can you guarantee that no matter how full it gets it will eventually empty?
Timwi
Timwi wrote:
How do you ensure, though, that the rate of emptying the queue is overall less than the rate of filling it? In other words, can you guarantee that no matter how full it gets it will eventually empty?
By hitting it with a rock until it goes back down. ;)
If we should find that it empties too slowly, we'll just add another machine to run on the queue.
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org