https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_meetings/RFC_review_2014-04-09
This Wednesday, I'd like to get some quick "is this RfC still valid/what's the next step?" checks on a few of our older RfCs. The list I currently suggest we look at:
UserMailer refactor Nonlinear versioning AuthStack Abstract table definitions Support for user-specific page lists in core
If you can't make this meeting, and you care about one of these RfCs, it would be great if you could comment on its talkpage before the meeting. Thanks!
We'll talk at Wednesday at 2200 UTC http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2200+utc+in+pt in #wikimedia-office on Freenode.
midnight in Berlin (sorry) 6pm in Montreal 3pm in California 8am in Sydney, Australia
On 04/07/2014 10:29 PM, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_meetings/RFC_review_2014-04-09
This Wednesday, I'd like to get some quick "is this RfC still valid/what's the next step?" checks on a few of our older RfCs. The list I currently suggest we look at:
UserMailer refactor Nonlinear versioning AuthStack Abstract table definitions Support for user-specific page lists in coreIf you can't make this meeting, and you care about one of these RfCs, it would be great if you could comment on its talkpage before the meeting. Thanks!
We'll talk at Wednesday at 2200 UTC http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2200+utc+in+pt in #wikimedia-office on Freenode.
midnight in Berlin (sorry) 6pm in Montreal 3pm in California 8am in Sydney, Australia
This is in ~15 minutes in #wikimedia-office.
On 04/09/2014 05:43 PM, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
On 04/07/2014 10:29 PM, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_meetings/RFC_review_2014-04-09
This Wednesday, I'd like to get some quick "is this RfC still valid/what's the next step?" checks on a few of our older RfCs. The list I currently suggest we look at:
UserMailer refactor Nonlinear versioning AuthStack Abstract table definitions Support for user-specific page lists in core
The full log's now at https://tools.wmflabs.org/meetbot/wikimedia-office/2014/wikimedia-office.201... and also on the meeting's wiki page, and I've put each RfC's discussion log on its own talkpage as well.
Aaron Schulz mentioned that someone should consult him and anomie regarding how to fix the externallinks issue; Aaron, you wanna expand on that? It sounded like it wasn't related particularly to any of the RfCs?
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Sumana Harihareswara <sumanah@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Aaron Schulz mentioned that someone should consult him and anomie regarding how to fix the externallinks issue; Aaron, you wanna expand on that? It sounded like it wasn't related particularly to any of the RfCs?
I believe that's referring to bug 57176,[1] which isn't related to the RFC except as something to avoid when designing the database indexes. If/when it comes to coding for that RFC, I hope it's stating the obvious to request that people loop me in on reviewing the API part of it sooner rather than later.
As for bug 57176, I'm willing to look at writing the code for it if Sean thinks the design in comment 7 looks good from a database perspective.
[1]: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57176
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org