2010/9/21 David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com:
Is this the problem that broke InstantCommons for pretty much everyone a few days ago?
Unless there's another obvious source of this information, I think it would be useful for folks using the InstantCommons feature to be included in a public list somewhere -- I just started such a list here:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Sites_using_InstantCommons
I think this would help to create more visibility and awareness for this functionality, and greater sensitivity to accidental breakage.
On 22 September 2010 07:49, Erik Moeller erik@wikimedia.org wrote:
Unless there's another obvious source of this information
If it were an extension, we would have a little [1]. There has been some talk about implementing optional statistics collection for MediaWiki installations (like some configuration variables and installed extensions), but nothing more thus far.
[1] http://s23.org/wikistats/mediawiki_extensions.php
On 22 September 2010 07:49, Erik Moeller erik@wikimedia.org wrote: Unless there's another obvious source of this information
Nope, thanks for doing that :)
If it were an extension, we would have a little [1]. There has been some talk about implementing optional statistics collection for MediaWiki installations (like some configuration variables and installed extensions), but nothing more thus far.
I threw around some ideas with Jeroen during GSoC this year, but nothing concrete ever came out of it. It's something I'd like to see happen (1.18?). Fully optional, of course.
-Chad
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org