In the Hebrew Wikipedia the "Category" namespace isn't translated (it should be translated to קטגוריה ). When it will be translated, what will happen to the category pages- will those pages be moved automatically to the new namespace? Will the links to category pages be modified automatically?
And another thing... printing in RTL languages is aligned to left because of this code in commonPrint.css: #content { background: none; border: none ! important; font-size: 11pt; padding: 0 ! important; margin: 0 ! important; text-align: left; } In the Hebrew Wikipedia we added this code to Mediawiki:monobook.css which align it to right: @media print { #content{ text-align:right; } }
Can someone add this code to RTL.css?
Thanks
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:54:11 +0200, Eran eran_roz@netvision.net.il wrote:
In the Hebrew Wikipedia the "Category" namespace isn't translated (it should be translated to קטגוריה ). When it will be translated, what will happen to the category pages- will those pages be moved automatically to the new namespace? Will the links to category pages be modified automatically?
The pages will not be "moved", since the namespace isn't striclty speaking part of the title - the database refers to the namespaces by a seperate, numeric, field. But from a user point of view, the title of each page will become translated with no manual intervention required.
Existing links, however, since they are just stored in the text of the individual articles, will *not* be altered - but it won't matter, because every copy of MediaWiki has a hard-coded set of "canonical" namespace names, which are the same as those of the English Wikipedia, with the exception of "Project:" (and "Project_talk:") where Wikipedia would have "Wikipedia:". These names are valid alternative titles for whatever pages exist - so, for example, one can refer to http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:IMSoP and find oneself at http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:IMSoP. In the case of Category links, therefore, you can use the prefix "Category:" to refer to a category page whatever language you're using.
To drift off topic, and I know it's been said before, but it would make a lot of sense if we didn't save the actual text of things like category links, and instead reconstructed them on demand from the links table(s). That way, categories could be managed from both directions, as it were - e.g. you could rename a category and have the members of the category transferred, not just the description. Something to think about, I feel, for future schema designing etc.
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org