The Cunctator wrote:
This is a wikipedia-l issue, not wikitech-l issue.
This /is/ a Wikiteck-l issue because allowing anon users the ability to make minor edits was a bug. Phase two /did not/ allow anon users to make minor edits and this feature was lost when Phase III was written.
Erik Moeller wrote:
If it is for all wikipedia's, it is a Intlwiki-l issue. Wikipedia-l is only the second list of en.wikipedia.
intwiki-l should be abolished and the wikipedia / wikien-l distinction should be more actively enforced.
Regards,
Erik
I disagree. IntlWiki-l should be about non-policy related interlanguage coordination issues and it should serve as the general mailing list for any Wikipedia language that does not yet have a mailing list.
Wikipedia-L is the /policy/ mailing list. General mailing lists are language specific if there is enough traffic to substantiate having a separate list or Intlwiki-L is used.
Giskart wrote
If it is for all wikipedia's, it is a Intlwiki-l issue. Wikipedia-l is only the second list of en.wikipedia.
See above about Intlwiki-l. Wikipedia-L is about policy for the whole project. There still is some talk on that list that is en.wiki specific but that's only because that list for /so/ long about project-wide policy and general en.wiki business.
--Daniel Mayer (aka mav)
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org