I'm getting 502 bad gateways / nginx error from all attempts to hit WMF sites including en.wikipedia and wikimedia.org and others, right now...
...And back for me.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:17 PM, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
I'm getting 502 bad gateways / nginx error from all attempts to hit WMF sites including en.wikipedia and wikimedia.org and others, right now...
-- -george william herbert george.herbert@gmail.com
On 02/08/2012 22:26, George Herbert wrote:
...And back for me.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:17 PM, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
I'm getting 502 bad gateways / nginx error from all attempts to hit WMF sites including en.wikipedia and wikimedia.org and others, right now...
-- -george william herbert george.herbert@gmail.com
From #wikimedia-operations
[22:24:08] <Lcawte> What happened? [22:24:43] <LeslieCarr> you know, everyone else gets vacation, the wiki takes a 5 minute bathroom break and everyone's upset ! [22:26:13] <LeslieCarr> in reality, looks like a bad squid config was pushed, then when it was rolled back, the site came back up
On 2 August 2012 22:38, Lewis Cawte lewiscawte@googlemail.com wrote:
From #wikimedia-operations [22:24:08] <Lcawte> What happened? [22:24:43] <LeslieCarr> you know, everyone else gets vacation, the wiki takes a 5 minute bathroom break and everyone's upset ! [22:26:13] <LeslieCarr> in reality, looks like a bad squid config was pushed, then when it was rolled back, the site came back up
This outage just got a press query from the BBC Newsroom!
Out of interest (if anyone has it quickly to hand), what is our uptime like? I recall it came through email in the last week or two, but I can't find the message ...
- d.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:07 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
This outage just got a press query from the BBC Newsroom!
Out of interest (if anyone has it quickly to hand), what is our uptime like? I recall it came through email in the last week or two, but I can't find the message ...
There's some #s at http://status.wikimedia.org/ but they don't go back in time too far.
-Jeremy
On 2 August 2012 23:12, Jeremy Baron jeremy@tuxmachine.com wrote:
There's some #s at http://status.wikimedia.org/ but they don't go back in time too far.
That's great :-) Here's what I sent them. Seems Wikipedia is *rather important* to the BBC newsroom at the moment ...
- d.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com Date: 2 August 2012 23:23 Subject: Re: Query from the BBC Newsroom To: [snip]
Technical hiccups happen occasionally, unfortunately :-) Most pass momentarily, more noteworthy ones tend to get noted on the technical mailing list. I would guess you experienced the problem detailed here:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2012-August/062111.html
There's a status page here: http://status.wikimedia.org/
Someone emailed our uptime over the last year to one of the lists recently, but I can't find it ...
We're not perfect - as a charity, we run on a shoestring - but we do our best and admit our hiccups and errors :-)
- d.
On 2 August 2012 22:37, [snip] wrote:
Dear Mr Gerard,
We noticed that Wikipedia was down for a short period of time this evening.
We wondered if there was a specific problem.
If you could either ring or email me that would be appreciated.
Regards,
[snip]
Tel No:[snip]
http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this.
As a guess... They probably wanted to make sure it was accidental and not some denial of service attack (i.e., newsworthy).
Were say Anonymous to jump on us for some unforseeable reason, it would be newsworthy, and I am sure the newsies would come running to everyone ever publicly identified as knowing anything about ops at the site...
-george
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:27 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 August 2012 23:12, Jeremy Baron jeremy@tuxmachine.com wrote:
There's some #s at http://status.wikimedia.org/ but they don't go back in time too far.
That's great :-) Here's what I sent them. Seems Wikipedia is *rather important* to the BBC newsroom at the moment ...
- d.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com Date: 2 August 2012 23:23 Subject: Re: Query from the BBC Newsroom To: [snip]
Technical hiccups happen occasionally, unfortunately :-) Most pass momentarily, more noteworthy ones tend to get noted on the technical mailing list. I would guess you experienced the problem detailed here:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2012-August/062111.html
There's a status page here: http://status.wikimedia.org/
Someone emailed our uptime over the last year to one of the lists recently, but I can't find it ...
We're not perfect - as a charity, we run on a shoestring - but we do our best and admit our hiccups and errors :-)
- d.
On 2 August 2012 22:37, [snip] wrote:
Dear Mr Gerard,
We noticed that Wikipedia was down for a short period of time this evening.
We wondered if there was a specific problem.
If you could either ring or email me that would be appreciated.
Regards,
[snip]
Tel No:[snip]
http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this.
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org