Hi everyone!
I've been working on a mediawiki extension to replace the WP1.0 bot[1]. The major aim is to make it easier to select and export article selections for various offline collections. It's at a stage where it could be considered 'feature reasonably complete' (90% feature complete, now to do the other 90% :) ).
The code is in the repository[2] and is named GPoC[3]. I'm hoping the devs with more experience in MW extension development will be able to CR my code and tell me what I can do to make it better. Ultimate aim is to make this 'deployment quality on WMF servers'. Pointers on what more needs to be done would be helpful. The commits on MW:CR are available here[4].
Thanks everyone! :)
[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:WP_1.0_bot [2]: http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/extensions/GPoC [3]: It means 'GSoC Proof of Concept', and I'll be glad if someone could find a better name [4]: http://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?path=trunk%2Fextensions%2FGPoC&titl...
I've been working on a mediawiki extension to replace the WP1.0 bot[1]. The major aim is to make it easier to select and export article selections for various offline collections. It's at a stage where it could be considered 'feature reasonably complete' (90% feature complete, now to do the other 90% :) ).
...
[3]: It means 'GSoC Proof of Concept', and I'll be glad if someone could find a better name
What do you think of ArticleSelection ?
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 06:57, Xavier Combelle xavier.combelle@free.fr wrote:
[3]: It means 'GSoC Proof of Concept', and I'll be glad if someone could find a better name
What do you think of ArticleSelection ?
Or PageSelection, to be less Wikipedia-centric...
On 17/08/11 11:28, Yuvi Panda wrote: <snip>
The code is in the repository[2] and is named GPoC[3]. I'm hoping the devs with more experience in MW extension development will be able to CR my code and tell me what I can do to make it better.
<snip>
I am not familiar with working with GSoC students. Do you prefer:
- comments in code review - patches - as bug reports - by emails
I will try to have a look at it over the next days.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Ashar Voultoiz hashar+wmf@free.fr wrote:
I am not familiar with working with GSoC students. Do you prefer:
- comments in code review - patches - as bug reports - by emails
Anything would do :)
IMHO code review comments are preferable. CR is always where I go - it's nice to have all comments centralized in one place along with relavent code, SVN integration, and it provides more accountability thanks to CR statuses like 'FIXME'.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Yuvi Panda yuvipanda@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Ashar Voultoiz hashar+wmf@free.fr wrote:
I am not familiar with working with GSoC students. Do you prefer:
- comments in code review
- patches
- as bug reports
- by emails
Anything would do :)
-- Yuvi Panda T http://yuvi.in/blog
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org