Hi
You should stick around, but you should also
understand that your
request isn't something that Wikimedia is likely to deploy since it
doesn't meet the needs of a significant part of the Wiki*-using community.
Right. But I thought the relation of effort to usage is important, (not only
the quantity of usage) and mine has a very low effort to implement (measured
in needed real-time), because the things already exist and only needs to be put
in, IMHO. (BTW, I explicitly know at least 4 other guys on wiki (and this is by
chance, I started no search), which also like to see my feature/aim implemented
-- even here people supported it)
Instead, since this is a tool *you* want, you should
look at creating a
tool that meets your needs. Since a few other people have expressed
I don't
call for an SVG-editor. These are other people here, which think I
should! :-( Please, don't tell me what I need to have to want (my needs are),
I think I can decide for myself best myself. :-/
I want to keep in principle everthing for mantaining/administration of SVG-files like any
other text-page-namespace here (storage-philosphy/version-control/diff/editing/...)!
If you think editing SVGs should be simpler, then I
suggest that the
I think editing (as a minor point) should be as every
text-namespace here, not
impossible online (all other text-namespaces are simple editable) like now, not
explicitly handled different (less/worse supported). Thus you miss the point.
I dislike to insult, but one should ask why permanently people don't realize
that I don't call for a SVG-editor. They mix up *their thought/idea* with my
(different) aim as if they don't read/understand what I had writen and then
claim I would request the other feature. This happened starting with the very
first message to this topic here. Sorry, to have blamed the big majority of
responses now. :-( I'm really nearly up to resign frustrated because of this
pschologic missbehavior here.
Nevertheless, regards
Achim
[Sorry Mark for sending you this twice]