Hi

You should stick around, but you should also understand that your request isn't something that Wikimedia is likely to deploy since it doesn't meet the needs of a significant part of the Wiki*-using community.

Right. But I thought the relation of effort to usage is important, (not only the quantity of usage) and mine has a very low effort to implement (measured in needed real-time), because the things already exist and only needs to be put in, IMHO. (BTW, I explicitly know at least 4 other guys on wiki (and this is by chance, I started no search), which also like to see my feature/aim implemented -- even here people supported it)

Instead, since this is a tool *you* want, you should look at creating a tool that meets your needs. Since a few other people have expressed

I don't call for an SVG-editor. These are other people here, which think I should! :-( Please, don't tell me what I need to have to want (my needs are), I think I can decide for myself best myself. :-/

I want to keep in principle everthing for mantaining/administration of SVG-files like any other text-page-namespace here (storage-philosphy/version-control/diff/editing/...)!

If you think editing SVGs should be simpler, then I suggest that the

I think editing (as a minor point) should be as every text-namespace here, not impossible online (all other text-namespaces are simple editable) like now, not explicitly handled different (less/worse supported). Thus you miss the point.

I dislike to insult, but one should ask why permanently people don't realize that I don't call for a SVG-editor. They mix up *their thought/idea* with my (different) aim as if they don't read/understand what I had writen and then claim I would request the other feature. This happened starting with the very first message to this topic here. Sorry, to have blamed the big majority of responses now. :-( I'm really nearly up to resign frustrated because of this pschologic missbehavior here.

Nevertheless, regards Achim

[Sorry Mark for sending you this twice]