Hoi, Count me out when you say that "*we* define the correct rendering of wikitext to be whatever the parser says it is". For some languages it just does not work properly. Consequently, either you are right and it is not for me to suggest that the parser does not is 100% or there is indeed room for improvement. Thanks, GerardM
On Nov 13, 2007 1:33 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
This whole discussion is without point. There is no need for change, is there? If it ain't broken, don't fix it.
The only reason the parser "ain't broke" is because we define the correct rendering of wikitext to be whatever the parser says it is. Under that definition, it's impossible for the parser to be broken, so your argument breaks down. (by something akin to falsifiability in science)
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l