On 10/03/2013 06:25 PM, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
On 10/03/2013 04:41 PM, Aaron Schulz wrote:
In any case, I would not want to see file cache removed until CDN support was evaluated, documented, and cleaned up, so people have an easy alternative in it's place.
If file cache is a stand-in for CDN support, why not keep support for file cache's as well as documenting and cleaning up the CDN support?
I'm not saying we should remove the file cache (certainly not without careful consideration and hopefully an easy alternative).
However, the answer to "why not support keep support" for both is pretty clear. It's another code path to maintain, and that means more work (meaning less time to work on other stuff), and potentially more bugs.
Matt Flaschen