Lee Daniel Crocker wrote:
Forgive me if there was a big discussion of this while I was in lurker mode for the past year or so, but is it really a good idea to allow arbitrary transclusions at all? I can see the usefulness of templates overriding the problems and limiting their spread to a few cases; but arbitrarily including text that constantly changes seems like a good way to screw up things like article provenance, evaluations, and such.
It was a bad idea. The users made me do it.
-- Tim Starling