On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Asher Feldman afeldman@wikimedia.org wrote:
That page wasn't suitable for high volume public consumption (very expensive db query + not properly cached), so the site problem persisted even after the db initially suspected as bad was rotated out.
What happened to it? When this page was introduced, it did have proper caching in memcached. Was that removed? Or did we get a cache stampede?
Roan