"Anthony" wikitech@inbox.org wrote in message news:71cd4dd90708131131k36ef2c17k39d1aae4234b7311@mail.gmail.com...
On 8/13/07, Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com
wrote:
I guess what has to happen before this can really be discussed is we need to drop the hypotheticals and come up with a semi-accurate list of actual conflicts. If a good portion of the conflicts are actually causing problems, then it's one thing. If most of them are just good faith collisions which wouldn't have even been discovered were it not for SUL, then it's another.
As far as I am aware, the time for discussion ended months, if not a year ago, and now it is simply a matter of waiting for the implementation to be completed. If that is the case (and correct me if it isn't) then this whole conversation is somewhat pointless.
- Mark Clements (HappyDog)