Is there any advantage or deteriment to using both eAccelerator AND memcached on the same single server Wikipedia mirror on a relatively low traffic site? The reason I ask is that eAccelerator is installed as a PHP plugin and memcached is also installed. MediaWiki is set to use memcached for caching, however eAccelerator picks up on the PHP script and caches them too. So I'm wondering if that's a good idea (possibly redudant) or should I disabled eAccel in favor of memcached? Far as I know memcached is set to use 128MB of RAM at the moment. eAccelerator appears to be set to use 32MB, if that matters for answering the question.
Mike O