I am also not talking about mediawiki at all. This evidence of edits that needs further review could be stored off-wiki, for example on wikimedia labs using some universal interface that all antivandalism tools can use
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Petr Bena benapetr@gmail.com wrote:
No I wouldn't. The queue would start getting filled up by good edits in case everyone who uses huggle would disconnect or stopped using it. The current system as it is clearly isn't sufficient for this. We need to cherry-pick the bad edits, not good edits. Current system allows only to flag good edits as "don't need review" which isn't really useful for anything...
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemowiki@gmail.com wrote:
That's a problem in the client, not in MediaWiki. To implement that with current code, you can patrol everything that is not suspicious and you'll get what you describe; if your patrolling bot is error-prone you may hypothetically need an "unpatrol" feature, but then just fix the bot.
Nemo
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l