I see 3 types of bug triages:
a. Up-front * Confirming bugs and assigning them to developers. * STATUS is "UNCONFIRMED", "NEW", "REOPENED"; RESOLUTION is N/A
b. Verify fix * Verifying fixes (STATUS is "RESOLVED"; RESOLUTION is "FIXED")
c. Accept non-fix resolution * Accepting all non-fixed resolution. * STATUS is RESOLVED; RESOLUTION is not "FIXED" (I count at least 5 non-"FIXED" RESOLUTION values)
Here is a Wikimedia bug table report: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/report.cgi?y_axis_field=product&x_axis_fi... the different format at the bottom of the web page. Hope this helps,Al Snow ###########################################################################
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:17:15 +0300 From: matanya@moses.co.il To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikitech-l] organize a bug triage
Hello,
We didn't have a bug triage since May. I suggest organizing one in a few weeks (say 2?)
I agree to take care of this if it is widely supported. How about focusing on patch triage?
I mean reviewing bugs with patches attached but not in gerrit.
Any other subject would be good as well.
opinions?
Matanya
_______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l