-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Moin,
On Monday 31 October 2005 20:57, Christopher E. Granade wrote:
Uwe Brauer wrote:
The idea sounds appealing and I would support it, however nothing has been implemented so far, as I understand
Uwe
That seems like a really interesting proposal, though it also seems like it would require a lot of work, and probably a seperation of "old-style" and "Liquid" discussion pages, as old talk pages would take a hell of a lot of work to convert- work that seems hard to justify in the long run. --Chris
OTOH, the currenty wikipages are not really suited to discussions at all - I'd rather not have someone edit my "posts" - whether it be for fixing the speling or whatever.
When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail - but I think a new disccusion support would be very good to have, even if it is a lot of work. The longer the old sytle pages are the only possibility, hte longer we will get more and more of them. :)
Best wishes,
Tels
- -- Signed on Tue Nov 1 00:01:40 2005 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email.
"To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent." -- Unknown