Amruta Lonkar schrieb:
2)Each of thses will be links with their own page and talk page.
- I think the 2nd part will be similar to working of the category namespace.
I can't tell you how to do the button magic, but I want to comment on your idea about the categories. In my opinion the pages for your foot note references should _not_ be in the category namespace because they have a completeley different semantic meaning than categories.
From my point of view there are two different options:
* Create a new namespace for all your foot note pages. That way you have them all in a separate namespace like with your category approach, but they do not mix with the real categories. * Create the foot note reference pages as sub pages of the article. E.g. if you have a page "Article", call your cited reference page "Article\Reference ABC" and so on. Which way is better suited, depends on what you want to do with the references. If you only need them in the context of the article, where they are used, you should probably take the sub page approach. If several articles might use the same reference and you want to look at all the references independent of the articles referring to them, then the approach using an own namespace might be more useful.
Ciao, Michael.