Essjay wrote:
I think I have to agree with all of the above; it seems this delved off as a sub-thread of the original, discussing edit throttles rather than pagemoves. I certainly have to agree with questioning the benefit of any change at all; we're doing pretty well without any restrictions, and if a wiki is having a problem with pagemove vandalism, it shouldn't be that hard for a list full of techies (Disclaimer: I'm not one.) to come up with a pagemove-vandal-blocking-bot just like the one running on en.wiki.
Which doesn't work well during rapid moves. Again, the proposal is to throttle pages moves to one per minute. Not hard, the move is already logged per user, and gives time to respond in the cases of abuse.