On 20/07/2010 16:25, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
That would be completely awesome!
Yes, that would help a lot, although it might be appropriate to still auto-defer reviews for some extensions in this queue, depending on whether or not enough reviewing happens for them (calling an extension "Semantic..." does not imply that SMW developers will review it ;-).
Markus
Cheers
-- Jeroen De Dauw
Don't panic. Don't be evil. 50 72 6F 67 72 61 6D 6D 69 6E 67 20 34 20 6C 69 66 65! --
On 20 July 2010 17:20, Max Semenikmaxsem.wiki@gmail.com wrote:
On 20.07.2010, 17:20 Chad wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Jeroen De Dauwjeroendedauw@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey,
About the semantic extensions:
It would actually be nice if they did not get marked deferred at all,
and be
reviewed by people that are familiar with them to some extend. I'm
willing
to do that for all commits not made by myself. Assuming this would not interfere to much with WMF code review of course :)
Cheers
If someone's going to start doing code review, that's fine. They've just all been getting deferred because nobody's been reviewing them so far.
We could create a separate review queue for it.
-- Best regards, Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l