Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
I've been putting this off, but eventually I need to write an update about how I'm treating priority (the first part of what Bugzilla labels "Importance") in the pile of bugs.
There should be consistency between documentation and reality. If you're going to call it and treat it as "priority," it should be labeled "priority." There's no reason to create confusion here.
Other than that, your proposal looks fine. My main concern is that this system you've created is going to be ignored by others. What happens if someone is assigned a highest priority bug and it hasn't been fixed in three weeks, for example? When your biggest weapon is a threat to assign the bugs to an Engineering Program Manager, it's a rather silly situation. But we'll see how this goes. :-)
MZMcBride