Elian explained to me the difference between Bugzilla and Mediazilla. But I still do not see well where the problem was :-(
Anthere a écrit:
Timwi a écrit:
Anthere wrote:
The plain idea is * that the opportunity is taken to clean up and organise better a couple of pages (such as http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Development_tasks) [...] **If a developer is ready to take care of a matter, just mentions it on development task. If he would be interested by getting in contract, please mentions it on [[development payment proposal]] (or any title you think best)
You have made no mention of MediaZilla, which saddens me a bit. I don't know about others, but personally, I would find a wiki page quite difficult to keep overviewable and organised, which is why I helped install MediaZilla. I think it is easier to prioritise individual items in MediaZilla, or break them up into constituent parts, etc. A developer can express their wish to take care of a particular bug or feature by simply assigning the item to themselves. The board can express their offer to pay for a particular feature or bug by simply adding a keyword (and perhaps leaving a comment with the amount). It can't really get any easier than this.
Timwi
Hu ?
I did not put it in the tasks because I understood it had already been set up. In your mail, you mention BugZilla, not MediaZilla, but I understood it was the same... just a better name :-)
If MediaZilla is already set, it is no more a task to do, if not entirely set, of course, you are free to add it.
Note that in http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Development_tasks#Recent_list_of_tasks.2C_uns..., your name is listed in front of BugZilla.
This is *typically* a task which you would have to explain better. If you want to propose something, you can add it to Development_tasks Proposal (or whatever title you think of) and explain exactly what it is about .