I don't mind getting dinged for typos. If I'm being sloppy it's fair to point it out.
However, I think the social contract should be that after I fix the typos you requested then you owe me a real code review where you look at the merits of the code. Code review is an awesomely useful but time consuming thing to provide. Patrolling for typos is not.
Put it this way, if I concede and agree that the bikeshed can be green, the people who spent three hours arguing for green should feel obligated to turn up to the working bee to help with the painting.
Luke Welling
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Bryan Tong Minh bryan.tongminh@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Jon Robson jdlrobson@gmail.com wrote:
This is a ridiculous conversation and I can't believe it now spans +20 messages.
Apparently you don't care, but other people do care. Please do not disregard other people's opinions because you believe yours is correct. To keep it in the style of this thread; attitudes like these do demotivate _me_.
Also, I fully agree with Maarten's last comment.
Bryan _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l