"Kate" keturner@livejournal.com wrote in message news:6019986.1hDDKoznoz@rose.local...
in 1.5, we have the possibility of changing URLs used for projects.
[examples snipped]
For the sake of lowering blood-pressure all around, should be assume that these new formats are **in addition** to those currently in use?
I like them, but I echo the concerns of those worried about breaking inward links.
Actually I like the possiblity of specifying links in more than one way to allow maximal flexibility. If we **can** handle it, then we **should** handle it. The principle of "least surprise" should come into pre-emptive action here.