David Barratt wrote:
the unclear CoCC action
Why do you feel that you need clarity on the CoCC's actions? or perhaps a better way to ask would be: What do you gain from getting more clarity?
I get the feeling you've never interacted with this group of people or similar groups within Wikimedia Foundation Inc. In my experience, you occasionally receive a vaguely threatening e-mail and when asking for details, you're told that those details are private. That is, I've been told that alleged incidents involving me cannot be discussed with me due to privacy concerns. Perhaps someone can explain how this makes sense.
I agree with Bináris that being compared to a Nazi or the Eye of Sauron is often a lot more offensive than a simple "What the fuck." This "conduct committee" is a political tool and it can easily be misused or abused as such via, for example, selective reporting and selective enforcement.
MZMcBride