On 11 May 2012 16:41, Chad innocentkiller@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not 100% sure what's being asked here? Is this a request to relicense MediaWiki under GPLv3 instead of v2? Or is this a question of it being mis-licensed under v3 when we actually specify v2? Clarification is needed :)
If it's an intact application that's included in the maintenance directory, does that make it (sufficiently plausibly) part of a mere aggregation? (that's a question for lawyers)
- d.