Andrew Dunbar wrote:
Polyglot is yet again misrepresenting the so-called vote. I really don't want to go through it again but anybody who wants to know the true sentiments felt by *all* the contributors to the en.wiktionary must read the relevant sections of the "voting" page, the Beer parlour, etc. It has a long history which Polyglot and a couple of others are very happy to gloss over because the change is what they want and it is convenient for them to make absolutely zero mention of the multiple heated debates.
I don't think anyone is trying to gloss things over, or ignoring the debate and votes. There were two votes. The first went slightly against the change, but the second was strongly in favour. You were notably alone against the change in the second vote until you managed to change a few minds after the fact.. When things didn't go your way you went ahead with a lot of spurious claims about the legitimacy of the vote. It's all a matter of public record.
When the anger died down a little I was told that in fact the scheme I've hoped for all along, full case folding, is planned for the long run.
Whatever you mean by "{full case folding" it was not a part of the discussion. If I'm wrong please show where this concept was discussed.
What this means is that we will be running around splitting all the articles in two now, making plenty of mess; then after that change, running around merging them back together in a different way!
Speculative.
Ec