Not really, but I think a lot of us are casting about for some alternatives. I am looking at it as a possible arbitration committee remedy. I like the coding even if semi-protection is rejected as a policy. We have certain situations we can't solve in a reasonable way. Making the editing by administrators only is way too restrictive, leaving it open to the unlimited unblockable sockpuppets some folks are willing to employ is just nonsense when there is a history of months of senseless edit warring.
Fred
On Dec 19, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Brion Vibber wrote:
Fred Bauder wrote:
Please consider my request at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/ Developer_help_needed#Open_requests
Are you referring to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Semi- protection_policy ?
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l