On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Tim Starling tstarling@wikimedia.orgwrote:
My concern with this kind of maintainer model is that RFC review would tend to be narrower -- a consensus of members of a single WMF team rather than a consensus of all relevant experts.
I'd also like to point out that we can still implement a maintainer system without changing the RFC process. There's no requirement that RFC review and maintainers be the same people. This thread is mainly a discussion about "Architects" (or the concept thereof), and how we might want to change the MediaWiki code review structure.
*-- * *Tyler Romeo* Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016 Major in Computer Science