El 03/12/12 19:40, Federico Leva (Nemo) escribió:
That data is hardly useful, it doesn't explain what it refers to
I agree a glossary of each term would be useful. It took me a while to realise that committers/closers/senders where the terms used for users of git/bugzilla/mailing list.
They should track authors instead of committers, though (preferably skipping merge commits)
Also, https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/weekly-bug-summary.cgi?tops=10&days=10000... proves they're not talking of the whole bugzilla but then they don't say which components.
Nemo
Looking at http://bitergia.com/public/previews/2012_11_mediawiki/data/db/acs_bicho_medi... they seem to have obtained data from bugs 1 to 19775. Not that they skipped bugs based on components.
Seems that Jesús did a fine job. It could be polished quite more with some local knowledge, merging users, hiding bots, etc. I would also change the layout of the summary page, making the graphs larger and placing the tables below. Plus some cosmetics empty brackets, missing name...