Le 07/03/2014 14:56, Bartosz Dziewoński a écrit :
On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 00:34:40 +0100, Brion Vibber bvibber@wikimedia.org wrote:
For years and years and years we've been very free about reverting things that break. No one, including old-timers like me and Tim, has the "right" to not have something reverted. If it needs to be reverted it will be reverted -- there is nothing personal in a revert. Remember it can always be put back once all problems are resolved.
I have missed the SVN period, but I am under impression that this was largely because "post-merge" code review has been used and that this is not something we should be overly proud of. :)
Reverting on spot because of site breakage still stand in our culture. I did a few revert without even thinking about contacting the original author because what mattered was to resume to a known state.
Most of our changes are not urgent and can well wait a couple days more to be refined. Heck, we can even deploy them out of the train if need be!