Threw my title around, see if that helps. :)
<quote name="Randall Farmer" date="2013-08-21" time="09:02:01 -0700">
Sadly they're moderating comments. I tweeted at the author, with links to WMF Ganglia as backup, and he definitely doesn't believe me; maybe something from a WMFer would help, if anyone thinks it's worth correcting: https://twitter.com/hassankhosseini/status/370090365354655744
Going by the Ganglia pages, actual Wikipedia has at lesat >2x the *RAM* that their scenario has *disk*. Pretty fun. (If you're curious, Ganglia's front page says it's tracking 14,744 cores on 988 hosts and 40T of RAM. Their scenario has <20T disk. There may be additional capacity not in that Ganglia setup, though it seemed to cover the obvious stuff.)
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:23 AM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 August 2013 16:12, hoo hoo@online.de wrote:
Am I wrong or did they actually calculate that for labs only (which would be rather funny)? At least they link to
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Ask/-5B-5BResource-20Type::insta......] that run on up to 385 instances [...]") which AFAIK doesn't have any production servers.
Heh. Please do post a comment of correction and post it here too, so it doesn't just vanish ;-)
- d.
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l