I assume "ktf" is short for Known To Fail? You've got a bit of RAS syndrome going on there... :-D
--HM
"dan nessett" dnessett@yahoo.com wrote in message news:842292.50373.qm@web32504.mail.mud.yahoo.com...
I have added an application option ktf-to-fail that when specified accumulates tests with known-to-fail status as if they failed. When this option is missing, failure statistics do not include known-to-fail results and there is a summary at the end of parserTests that specifies how many known-to-fail tests were run (unless that number is zero). I also have modified parserTests to indicate the known-to-fail status when that option is specified.
But, there is still an issue. How should the per-test known-to-fail option interact with the compare and record application options? Should parserTests be modified to record and compare known-to-fail results? Or, should these results be silent for recording purposes and treated as failures only if the ktf-to-fail application options is specified?