On 01/06/05, James D. Forrester james@jdforrester.org wrote:
Hmm. If you link to a sound-file with {{Image:}} (or {{Sound:}} you'd want to transclude it, even if the software won't let you. [[Sound:]] would then be a link to the sound, and the overall manner of links would make more sense.
Sorry, I don't follow what you're saying here - are you saying that "transcluding a sound" *is* the same as displaying a specially formatted set of links/player, or that it isn't? Like I say, I can see how "transcluding an image" could mean displaying it inline, but I'm not sure that "transcluding a sound" is really a meaningful concept. At the moment, you can transclude the *description page*, but I don't think anyone would really miss that ability.
Don't get me wrong, I can see the argument for having a different syntax for "display inline" than for "link to", I'm just not 100% convinced that this is logically the same as "transclude from".