On 9/17/07, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason avarab@gmail.com wrote:
- there should be another, similar, tag for "real" footnotes. <note>
would be great. They would operate identically to (1).
Do you just want the ability to make two citation-like lists per article whereas you can make one now? If that's the case wouldn't a system where you can make and flush an arbitrary number of lists be better?
How many are we likely to want? Enough that general-purposing the mechanism (rather than a second instance) makes sense?
- named REFs can have another parameter, "page=". These would be
collected into the references at the bottom, with each lettered reference appearing.
A variation of this has already been suggested and I believe there's an open bug for it. "category" or "section" is more agnostic to the format being cited than "page" although I guess all could be provided.
How about 'specific="page 45-47"'; that way you can put in whatever internal location specification makes contextual sense given the media being referred to...