"Steve Bennett" wrote:
On 10/12/06, Platonides wrote:
Changing page rendering depending if user is blocked or not won't happen. It would break page caching (this appeared before but asking to change 'edit' into 'view source').
Can you be more precise about "breaking page caching"? Purely hypothetically, it would be possible to store two different caches for each page, one for blocked users and one for everyone else, right? Or is this one of those "the amount of work required far outweighs the benefit" situations?
Steve
I'm not a cache expert, i can't give very accurate answers, but i'd say the devs will gladly implement this system for you... as far as you give them the hardware to double our caching ability :-)
Tim Starling: Good point. We could then choose to send them either to 'action edit' or 'action view for 404'. Though a new arrive message might be preferable, in order to avoid "You can create this page" links on noarticletext.