Strainu and Pine:
If developers learn they can't trust you to distinguish reasonable expectations from unreasonable ones (this falls into the "ludicrously unreasonable" category, by the way), don't be surprised if they ultimately start to doubt even your legitimate complaints.
There are very important discussions to be had about how software development works in the Wikimedia movement. This is absolutely not one of them.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Strainu strainu10@gmail.com wrote:
2016-12-12 10:21 GMT+02:00 Quim Gil qgil@wikimedia.org:
Hi, let me check this incident under the light of the Technical Collaboration Guideline https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_Collaboration_Guideline
(draft
under review, feedback welcome in the related discussion pages).
Guideline/Milestone_communication
defines when and where are communications expected.
Thank you for the pragmatic approach Quim. I launched 2 discussions there, referring to changes that require action from the communities [1] and changes affecting large number of pages [2]. Hopefully we can find a middle ground on at least some of the subjects.
Strainu
[1] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Th1vs3h97d96ajaf [2] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Th1wc4pu1qplo4k8
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l