Brion, Have you checked if Vexflow renders svg properly on you Macbook/Ubuntu? Maybe you can get some ideas from its code. http://vexflow.com/
Thanks for working on this, David --Micru
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Brion Vibber bvibber@wikimedia.org wrote:
I've done a little weekend hacking experimenting with adding higher-resolution output support for the Score extension -- the current PNG images look pixelated or fuzzy when printed or viewed on high-DPI (eg 'Retina') displays.
There's two avenues I'm exploring:
- https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/62243/ - outputs SVG instead of PNG
In theory, SVGs will scale cleanly to any screen or print resolution; but some older browsers (IE < 9 and Android < 3) won't display them.
Unfortunately I'm getting totally corrupted SVG output on my MacBook with Lilypond 2.16.2. On my Ubuntu 12.04 machine with 2.14.something I get complete-looking SVGs, but they're missing the XML namespace and so won't render.
So far there's no PNG fallback made, which would be needed (either by converting the SVGs or by running lilypond twice with different backends). Also don't know if the SVGs are full-page or trimmed, since they don't display.
- https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/62313/ - allows for producing
higher-resolution PNGs
This adds a $wgScoreScale setting, which can be cranked up from the 1.0 default to say 2.0 to render PNGs twice as big as normal and scale them down in the browser.
This looks great in a PDF or on a Retina screen, but the scale-down might not be ideal on traditional screens with some browsers.
Could be improved by outputting to multiple resolutions (1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 scale) and using 'srcset' to specify which image goes to which resolution.
(In this version, I'm storing the images' width/height in a .json file.)
Any ideas or preferences on which is the better way to go?
-- brion _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l