In general I would prefer to keep vulgar language out of the projects, as it doesn't bring anything positive. Research shows that swearing causes stress [1], and there are many ways of showing dissatisfaction without using coarse language.
For instance, I would appreciate if there would be more interest in using Nonviolent Communication, as it is more effective in getting the message across than with negativity. Introduction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-129JLTjkQ
Regards, Micru
[1] http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0022341
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 5:53 PM Bináris wikiposta@gmail.com wrote:
That's what I called a very first world problem. This happens when American culture and behavioral standard is extended to an international community. It is not rally polite to write that F-thing (how many times has it been written directly or abbreviated or indirectly in this very discussion?). But to ban a member of the technical community from the working environment is really harmful. Although we do block people from editing Wikipedia, too, but we do it publicly, clearly, comparably, and by the rules of the local community, not by hidden rules of admin board. And not for one ugly word. This secret banning undermines the community, and therefore it is destructive.
Additionally, as code of conduxt itself was discussed here, the coc file case was discussed here a few weeks ago, and this is the place where most Phabricatos users communicate, this is a good place to discuss this case, too. Publicity is good. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l