Dori wrote:
On 4/21/05, Magnus Manske magnus.manske@web.de wrote:
Can do. How about img_metadata, with XML? We could add more EXIF data or other metadata about the image there. Or would that be too slow to parse?
Might I suggest file_metadata, we don't want to get stuck with img for files again. I could see how metadata for other files might be useful. Just have one of the fields be the type of file.
The table is called "image", all field names in that table are prefixed with img_, that's how it's been since phase3 was written. We're already stuck with it, it's too late.
-- Tim Starling